|
|

|
Edited by: Roger Blanpain, Andrzej Marian Swiatkowski
February 2009,
ISBN 9041128506
ISBN 13:
9789041128508
276 pp.
Paperback
USD price: $154.00
|
|
|
|
Now also available as
eBook
Two recent decisions of the European Court of Justice – Laval and Viking Line
– have ignited a politically explosive controversy over the role of collective
labour actions in the European industrial market. Far from settling a
long-standing contentious issue, it appears that the Court has brought
opposing interests into sharper conflict, in the process also exacerbating
tensions between ‘old’ and ‘new’ Member States. Although the ultimate impact
of the two decisions on national labour law regimes is unpredictable, the need
for a summing-up of trends so far is clearly advantageous to all concerned
parties. To this end, in this book nineteen labour law scholars present
country reports detailing challenges and consequences of the rulings evident
in twelve EU Member States, as well as in Norway and Russia. Among many
others, the salient issues covered include the following:
-
cross-border solidarity among workers;
-
collective action as a fundamental freedom;
-
the prospects for an EU minimum wage plan;
-
the ‘social partners’ approach to national labour law;
-
the harmonisation of social security standards; and
-
the scope of enforcement by Member State labour regulatory authorities.
The authors recognize that, in the interest of a unified European market, it
is of prime concern to create a structured balance between the rights of
employers to freely move their business entities and services and the rights
of workers and their representative organizations to undertake actions
protecting common work interests. The studies in this book allow lawyers,
academics and policymakers to evaluate the degree to which this objective has
been furthered or constrained by these two landmark cases, and to assess the
direction in which national Member State labour law is moving as a result.
Features:
;
-
Analysis of the initial effects of Laval and Viking Line on national labour
law regimes
-
Country-by-country analysis of the current position of collective labour
actions under EU law
-
Analysis of the current role of labour regulatory authorities in EU Member
States
Benefits:
;
-
Allows concerned parties to grasp the variety of trends in labour law stemming
from Laval and Viking
-
Comparative approach enlarges the scope of potential strategies for
practitioners and policymakers
-
Clearly identifies new elements affecting the protection of both economic and
labour rights in Europe
Notes on Contributors. Foreword. National Reports: Austria:
National Report on Possible Effects on Austrian Labour Law Due to the Latest
Judgements of the European Court of Justice on Fundamental Freedoms and
Collective Actions; K. Grillberger, E. Felten. Belgium: Laval
and Viking; R. Blanpain. Influence of Laval and Viking upon Belgian
Individual and Collective Labour Law; P. Humblet. Denmark: The
Viking Line and Laval Cases Seen from a Danish Perspective; R. Nielsen.
Estonia: Freedom of Services and Establishment and Industrial Conflict:
Impact of the ECJ Cases on Estonian Labour Law; M. Muda. Finland:
ECJ and the Challenge of Understanding Collective Bargaining; N. Bruun.
Germany: Freedom of Establishment versus Right to Collective Action:
Developments in the Shadow of the Court; M. Schlachter. Greece:
The Impact of the ECJ Judgements Viking and Laval on Domestic Labour Rights:
‘Bolkenstein’ by the Back Door; N. Aliprantis, G. Katrougalos.
Hungary: Freedom of Services, Establishment and Industrial Conflicts:
Country Report: Hungary; G. Kiss, E. Kajtár. Italy: Viking
and Laval: Impacts on the Right to Strike and Collective Autonomy in the
Italian Legal System; G. Orlandini. Lithuania: Strikes as ultima
ratio Method of Social Conflicts Resolution: Lithuanian Case; D. Petrylaite.
Norway: Market Freedoms, Labour Market Regulation and Trade Union
Rights: Worlds Apart in EU Law? S. Evju. Poland: The Right of
Trade Unions to Collective Action versus the Right to Freely Carry Out
Economic Activity and the Right to Free Movement of Services within the
European Union; A.M. Świątkowski. Russia: Laval and
Viking Cases: A View from Russia; N. Lyutov. United Kingdom: British
Labour Law after Laval and Viking; E. Szyszczak. The Implications of
Viking and Laval for UK Labour Law; T. Novitz. Annex: Case C-341/05.
Case C-438/05.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|