The WTO Secretariat reports that during the period from 1995 to June 30, 2007
WTO members initiated 3097 anti-dumping investigations. Of these, 474 were put
forward by India, which made it the largest user of this measure among WTO
Members. The traditional argument of developing countries was that loopholes
or absence of clear definitions in the anti-dumping rules have increased the
possibility of abuses and discretionary practices against them. Now, many
developing countries like India have become frequent users of this measure.
For a better understanding of the various provisions of the WTO's Anti-dumping
Agreement (ADA) a critical investigation of the resulting jurisprudence is a
necessity. To that end, this timely work has a fivefold aim:
• To explore the jurisprudence that has emerged around the anti-dumping regime
and how it affected developing countries;
• To assess how effectively and to what extent the WTO's Dispute Settlement
Body (DSB) is able to analyze the violations of ADA provisions;
• To examine domestic compliance with DSB decisions;
• To study the Indian cases which come before the nation's Customs, Excise &
Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, various High Courts and the Supreme Court of
• To offer recommendations for the improvement of the anti-dumping regime from
a developing country perspective.
Table of Contents. List of Abbreviations. List of Figures, Flow Charts
and Tables. Table of GATT Panel Cases. Table of Indian Cases. Table of WTO
Cases. Foreword. About the Author. Acknowledgements. Introduction. 1.
The Concept and History of Anti-dumping 2. The Nuts and Bolts of the
WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement 3. Determination of the Dumping Margin 4.
Injury, Threat of Material Injury Test and Causal Link 5. Procedural
Issues in Anti-dumping Cases 6. The Standard of Review under the
Anti-dumping Agreement 7. The Use of the ‘Facts Available’ Provision in
Anti-dumping Cases 8. Special and Differential Treatment in the ADA
9. The Indian Practice of Anti-dumping 10. Indian Jurisprudence on
Anti-dumping 11. Future Directions in Anti-dumping