|
|

|
|
|
The Framework Agreement on Telework (2002) was the first of the
non-legally binding (soft law) agreements concluded by the European Social
Partners. The employer organisations UNICE, CEEP, and UEAPME, and the trade
union organisation ETUC. Although the forum on which this book is based
focused on the telework agreement, the subject matter of the papers and
discussion centred on the nature of the framework agreements themselves, on
the role of the social partners, and on implications for the future of
European labour law. The forum took place in Brussels with the support of the
Royal Flemish Academy in September 2006. The book prints sixteen papers by
distinguished labour law authorities representing legal academic, managerial
and policy dimensions either originally presented at the forum or emerging
from it. Among the far-reaching questions raised are the following:
-
Do the framework agreements constitute a ‘new way’ of developing European
employment law?
-
Under what circumstances will a teleworker be able to act to obtain social
protection under a framework agreement?
-
Are we heading for a social Europe where mere recommendations, rather than
labour market rules, are the norm?
-
Where is the line between ‘regular’ and ‘non-regular’ telework?
A consensus seems to emerge that the framework agreements, in their
support of the transition from ‘job security’ to ‘employability,’ are leading
soft law into what may aptly be called ‘liquid law.’ The papers include
reports on implementation and development of framework agreements in
individual countries including Belgium, the Netherlands, France, Germany,
Italy, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, as well as a report on the United
States. For the important and urgent questions it raises about telework and
the ‘new world of work’ that telework so clearly represents, this book will
engage the committed attention of everyone involved in the fields and
activities shaped by labour and employment law in Europe and throughout the
world.
European Reports.
1. The European Social Dialogue: A General Introduction; J. Morin.
2. The Framework Agreement on Telework; ETUC, UNICE, UEAPME, CEEP.
3. The European Social Dialogue and Voluntary Framework Agreements; R.
Blanpain.
4. Report on the Implementation of the European Framework Agreement on
Telework; ETUC, UNICE, UEAPME, CEEP. National Reports.
5. Belgium; R. Blanpain.
6. Belgium, the National Collective Bargaining Agreement on Telework; C.
Engels.
7. Belgium and the Netherlands, E-monitoring the Teleworker; F. Hendrickx.
8. France; J.-E. Ray, J. Rojot.
9. Germany; M. Weiss.
10. Italy; M. Colucci. 11. The Netherlands; A. Jacobs.
12. Poland; A. Swiatkowski.
13. Sweden; B. Nyström.
14. The United Kingdom; A. Neal.
15. United States of America; A. Goldman.
16. IBM’s On Demand Workplace Strategy in a Nutshell; C. Dirckx.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|